Peer Review Policy

The "Liberal Journal of Language and Literature Review" (LJLLR) is committed to publishing high-quality, original research that contributes significantly to the fields of language and literature. We achieve this through a rigorous peer-review process designed to ensure the scholarly merit and impact of all published articles. This document outlines the key principles and procedures governing our peer review policy.

2. Objectives of Peer Review

The objectives of the peer review process for LJLLR are:

  • To evaluate the originality, significance, and methodological soundness of submitted manuscripts.
  • To identify areas for improvement and provide constructive feedback to authors.
  • To ensure that published articles meet the highest academic standards and contribute to the advancement of knowledge in language and literature.

3. Reviewers

Reviewers are selected based on their expertise in the relevant areas of language and literature, publication record, and active research engagement. All reviewers are expected to maintain confidentiality and objectivity throughout the review process.

4. Process

The peer review process for LJLLR follows a double-blind format. This means that the identities of both authors and reviewers are kept anonymous throughout the process. Each manuscript is typically reviewed by two independent reviewers selected by the editor-in-chief or associate editors. Reviewers are asked to provide a written report that addresses the following aspects of the manuscript:

  • Originality: Does the manuscript present a novel contribution to the field?
  • Significance: Is the topic relevant and important to a broad audience of scholars?
  • Methodology: Are the research methods and data analysis sound and appropriate?
  • Clarity and coherence: Is the writing clear, concise, and well-organized?
  • References: Are the references relevant and up-to-date?

Based on the reviewers' reports, the editor-in-chief makes a final decision on whether to accept, reject, or request revisions to the manuscript. Authors are provided with detailed feedback from the reviewers to help them improve their work.

5. Ethics

LJLLR adheres to the highest ethical standards in scholarly publishing. Reviewers are expected to:

  • Maintain confidentiality of the manuscript and review process.
  • Declare any potential conflicts of interest.
  • Provide objective and unbiased feedback.
  • Avoid plagiarism and other forms of academic misconduct.

Authors are also expected to uphold ethical standards by:

  • Submitting original work that has not been published elsewhere.
  • Disclosing any sources of funding or conflicts of interest.
  • Acknowledging the contributions of others.
  • Addressing reviewer feedback in a professional and respectful manner.